Baan Suriya Chan (Soluna) · Hin Kong, Ko Pha Ngan · 9.74°N
Solar panels + heat reductionSimpler constructionModern JapandiPassive thermal ventilation
Proposal: Replace the hip roof (30°, four-sided slopes) with a mono-pitch shed roof. Orientation: High wall on East (pool side, 73° azimuth), slope descending toward West. Overhangs: East (pool) 4.0m · West 1.5m. Motivations: Solar panel optimization + roof heat reduction, simpler construction, passive thermal ventilation via Breezway Powerlouvres, clean modern aesthetic.
1 — Pitch Calculator — Dimensions at Different Angles
Shed spans 9.45m E–W. Low wall (West) 3.26m — raised so W eave = 3.0m with continuous slope. East overhang 4.0m, West overhang 1.5m.
Pitch
W Wall
E Wall
Height Δ
E Eave (4m ov)
W Eave (1.5m ov)
Roofing
Notes
5°
3.13m
3.96m
0.83m
4.31m ✓
3.0m
metal only
Very subtle slope
7°
3.18m
4.34m
1.16m
4.83m ✓
3.0m
metal only
Noticeable, gentle
★ 10°
3.26m
4.93m
1.67m
5.64m ✓
3.0m
metal only
Sweet spot — dramatic without extreme
12°
3.32m
5.33m
2.01m
6.18m ✓
3.0m
metal only
Very tall east wall
15°
3.40m
5.93m
2.53m
7.00m
3.0m
some tiles OK
Tall east wall
20°
3.55m
6.99m
3.44m
8.44m
3.0m
most tiles OK
Extreme east height
W wallH = 3.0 + 1.5 × tan(θ) (raised so W eave = 3.0m) |
E wallH = W wallH + 9.45 × tan(θ) |
E eave = E wallH + 4.0 × tan(θ) |
W eave = W wallH − 1.5 × tan(θ) = 3.0m |
Metal roofing ≥ 3°, concrete/clay tiles ≥ 15°
Four-sided slopes, ridge at center · from Yuki engineering S1-05
Proposed
Shed Roof — 10°
Single slope · E overhang 4.0m · W overhang 1.5m
3 — Elevation Comparison
East Elevation (Pool Side, 25m)
The facade seen from the pool — the most important visual
Hip Roof
Hip — East Elevation
Hipped ends slope down at N/S · no vertical gable walls
Proposed
Shed — East Elevation
Clean single roofline at 5.38m · clerestory + Powerlouvres
North Elevation (Short End, 9.45m)
Hip Roof
Hip — North End
Hip slope from all sides — no vertical gable wall
Proposed
Shed — North End
Sloped top: low left (W), high right (E) with Powerlouvres
4 — Interior Ceiling + Thermal Ventilation
Hip Roof
Hip Interior — Symmetric Peak
Raked ceiling with wood lining, ridge beam at center
Proposed
Shed Interior — Thermal Stack Effect
Cool air enters W (low) → hot air exits E (high Powerlouvres)
Passive cooling via Breezway Powerlouvres:
The 1.67m height difference between W entry (3.26m) and E Powerlouvres (4.93m) creates a natural stack effect.
Hot air rises along the sloped ceiling and exits through the automated louvres on the high east wall.
Fresh air is drawn in through openings flanking the west entry door.
The Powerlouvre system provides 90% ventilation when fully open, with built-in temperature sensors for automatic operation.
(Breezway,
Architropics)
5 — Solar Analysis + Roof Heat Reduction
Solar panels as roof insulation: A UC San Diego study (Solar Energy journal, peer-reviewed) found that
solar PV panels reduce heat reaching the roof by 38% and keep ceilings 5°F (2.8°C) cooler.
The panels act as roof shading — the sun beats on the panels instead of the roof surface,
and wind flowing between the tilted panels and roof removes trapped heat.
Tilted panels (like on a shed roof) provide more cooling than flat-mounted.
(UC San Diego,
Conserve Energy Future)
Facade
Azimuth
Hip: eave / sun hrs
Shed 10°: eave / sun hrs
Change
East (pool)
73°
2.42m
5.2h
5.64m
1.5h
−71% sun
West
253°
2.42m
5.0h
3.0m
5.0h
~same
North
343°
~3.0m
1.5h
~3.8m
1.2h
−20%
South
163°
~3.0m
1.8h
~3.8m
1.6h
−11%
Sun hours = average direct sun on wall at equinox. Hip: ~1.0m overhangs, 30° pitch.
Shed: E=4.0m, W=1.5m overhangs (flat soffit), 10° pitch.
The dramatically higher E eave (5.64m vs 2.42m) nearly eliminates direct sun on the pool-facing wall.
Sun Path & Shadow Projection — Equinox (Mar/Sep)
Top-down view · house rotated −17° from true N · latitude 9.74°N
Solar panels: Shed roof = ~250 m² unbroken W-facing slope at 10° (~40 kWp, ~82% of south-optimal yield, peak generation in afternoon matching AC load).
Hip roof = ~130 m² fragmented across 4 slopes at 30° (~50% of shed capacity).
Panels also reduce roof heat by 38% and cool ceiling by 2.8°C (UC San Diego).
Combined benefit: Solar panels generate electricity and reduce roof heat by 38%.
The shed roof provides ~250 m² of unbroken west-facing slope for panels, versus ~130 m² on the hip.
Combined with Powerlouvre thermal exhaust, this creates a three-layer cooling system:
panels shade the roof, the sloped ceiling channels hot air up, and Powerlouvres exhaust it.
6 — Rain Protection & Drainage
Hip Roof
Hip — Rain Drainage
Water drains to all 4 sides · gutters needed everywhere
Proposed
Shed — Rain Drainage
ALL water drains West (away from pool) · E side stays dry
7 — Numbers at a Glance
Hip Roof (Current Design) — 30°
Wall height3.0m (all sides)
Ridge height5.73m
E eave (pool, ~1m ov)~2.42m
W eave (~1m ov)~2.42m
Interior peak5.73m at center
Roof area~340 m²
StructureRidge + hip rafters + purlins
DrainageAll 4 sides
Thermal ventilationNo height differential
Shed Roof (Proposed) — 10°
E wall (high)4.93m
W wall (low)3.26m
E eave (pool, 4m ov)5.64m
W eave (1.5m ov)3.0m
Interior ceiling4.93 → 3.26m slope
Roof area~290 m² (−15%)
StructureSimple wall-to-wall rafters
DrainageWest only
Thermal ventilation1.67m stack + Powerlouvres
8 — Assessment Summary
Shed Roof Advantages
E eave 5.64m vs 2.42m — pool side headroom more than doubled
Simpler construction — no ridge beam, no hip rafters, just wall-to-wall rafters
~2× solar panel capacity — 250 m² unbroken slope vs 130 m² fragmented hip
Roof heat −38% — solar panels act as roof shading (UC San Diego)
Passive thermal ventilation — Powerlouvres on 4.93m E wall + stack effect
All V4/V5 plans affected — elevations, roof plan, ceiling, structural
10° raked ceiling — gentle slope, less dramatic than hip's 30° peak
Stack effect caveat — less effective when indoor/outdoor temps are similar (tropical)
9 — Structural & Cost Impact
Saves Cost
No ridge beamMajor saving
No hip raftersEliminates HRS1/HRS2
Simpler raftersWall-to-wall span
Less roof area−50 m²
No hip framing4 fewer corners
Adds Cost
Taller E wall4.93m × 25m
Wind bracingTaller = more force
Metal roofingDepends on spec
Redesign feesEliya + Yuki
PowerlouvresAlready spec'd
Net Assessment
StructuralSimpler overall
Materials~Neutral
LaborLikely lower
Design reworkSignificant
Long-term valueSolar + cooling ROI
10 — Decision Points for Carlos & Eliya
Key questions before committing:
1. Metal vs tiles — is standing-seam metal roofing acceptable? (required at 10°, could be aesthetic plus for modern look)
2. E wall 4.93m, W wall 3.26m — Carlos noted even 500mm raise is significant scope. Both walls raised. Structural + cost implications?
3. Yuki engineering — ~80% complete on hip roof (S1-05). What's the rework cost/timeline?
4. Powerlouvre placement — high E wall section (above ~3.5m) for thermal exhaust — coordinate with Breezway specs.
5. Solar panel spec — west-facing 10° tilt: get quote from installer. 250 m² available area.
6. Timeline — V5 plans are near-final. Roof type change is fundamental. When is point of no return?